Notas sobre un jurista olvidado : Julio Herrera y su intervención parlamentaria con motivo de la reforma del código penal en la República Argentina (1902-1903)

Resumen: Este trabajo pretende contribuir a una producción historiográfica en desarrollo en los últimos años cuyo objetivo es el estudio de los discursos y prácticas de un conjunto de juristas argentinos adherentes al positivismo penal que desde fines del siglo XIX impulsaron una serie de iniciativas de reforma penal y penitenciaria (creación y dirección de instituciones carcelarias y post penitenciarias; renovación de la producción científica y universitaria; elaboración de propuestas legislativas; etc.). En esta ocasión, analizaremos la figura de Julio Herrera, uno de los más distinguidos penalistas argentinos, aunque paradójicamente ignorado por los estudios históricos e histórico-jurídicos, centrándonos en su intervención parlamentaria con motivo del proyecto de reforma del código penal presentado en la Cámara de Senadores en 1903.

Biblical evidence from Obadiah and Psalm 137 for an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah in the sixth century B.C.E.

Abstract: Focusing on Obadiah and Psalm 137, this article provides biblical evidence for an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah during the Babylonian crisis ca. 588–586 B.C.E. After setting a context that includes the use of treaties in the ancient Near East to establish expectations for political relationships and the likelihood that Edom could operate as a political entity in the Judahite Negev during the Babylonian assault, this article demonstrates that Obadiah’s poetics include a density of inverted form and content (a reversal motif) pointing to treaty betrayal. Obadiah’s modifications of Jeremiah 49, a text with close thematic and terminological parallels, evidence an Edomite treaty betrayal of Judah. Moreover, the study shows that Obadiah is replete with treaty allusions. A study of Psalm 137 in comparison with Aramaic treaty texts from Sefire reveals that this difficult psalm also evidences a treaty betrayal by Edom and includes elements appropriate for treaty curses. The article closes with a discussion of piecemeal data from a few other biblical texts, a criticism of the view that Edom was innocent during the Babylonian crisis, and a suggestion that this treaty betrayal may have contributed to the production of some anti-Edom biblical material.